<title>The Patriot Act has a larger purpose than can be imagined. </title> <p>An instance was brought on his behalf because he was jailed for such a long time with no charges filed against him along with other problems that were in violation of his Constitutional rights. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It is believed that this was only done so that the Supreme Court would not hear the  case since the Bush Administration will have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed which had to complete with the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been faced with lesser and less specific crimes though Attorney General Ashcroft had stated as he was detained that the evidence against Padilla was overwhelming. He was subjected to and the length of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial before he was set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that because of the torture. A judge ruled he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007) that he was competent and.</p><!--more--> <p>On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to give it towards the 8th of December, giving the energy to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and lots of other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our constitutional rights. February 28th, 2011 was considered to be the very last day of the Patriot Act since no new legislation had been passed. With this specific extension, America waits for hearings to be held because of the Judiciary Committee. When it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted because of it and Democrats argued against the extension. However, what was a shock to numerous was the  fact that sixty-five Democrats voted when it comes to extension associated with the Patriot Act. One out of particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the best ranking democrat on the Intelligence Committee, would like to see this extension most of the way through to 2013. Lots of the 27 Republicans who voted against the extension, such as for instance Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American people will face a legitimate danger of out-of-control prosecutions along with the chance for out-of-control spy networks taking effect.</p> <p>Groups like the privacy that is electronic Center (EPIC) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform for the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will take benefit of the balance and employ of this capacity to trouble innocent people in the Muslim-American communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared ahead of the House subcommittee in the dependence on reform of this Patriot Act, arguing that the Government track of communications without any proof is a violation of this peoples that are american basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to get reports on intelligence law violations from the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on one or more occasion into the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to are accountable to Congress any investigations that are unlawful the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.</p> <h2>The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the  power associated with the Patriot Act.</h2> <p> as an example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens trying to gain residency that is permanent citizenship, visas and work permits <a href="https://essaywritersite.com/write-my-paper-for-me">https://essaywritersite.com/write-my-paper-for-me</a> in the usa are being scrutinized under the new requirement system for the Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) managed to get clear if you will find any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility then they will receive disapproval. More stringent government standards and thorough criminal record checks are simply another obstacle produced by the Patriot Act. These new rules under the Patriot Act also not in favor of the majority of the checks and balances through the Bill of Rights that was placed into location to protect citizens’ privacy. A discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review if the government suspects they are engaging in anything terrorist related at that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel. For internet surfers, it opens the door for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and peer-to-peer systems. Also put in the middle of the arguments are companies and public libraries that need to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, at the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification to their customers.</p> <p>I think that particular components of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not merely from Congress, but in addition from the Supreme Court. Congress can be the cause by making certain the  laws they pass try not to opposed to the protections promised to Americans in the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments associated with the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to make sure that the Constitution is upheld even though it comes down to cases that deal with suspected terrorists that are American citizens. Our laws are making this country what it is but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation today. The freedom of life, liberty and property has converted into greed. Terrorist acts against the US terrify many Americans, however in many cases, power and money scares them more. The individuals vote to have government representation nevertheless the social people have to be more involved with your decision making process. As americans to make sure that those people do not remain in office if you elect someone to office and they do not do the job correctly, it is up to us. That can only be done if people have more mixed up in process that is political not just be happy with what goes on.</p> <p>The expression “land regarding the free” is used too generously. The way in which it is now, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country stands for and deprives us all of our civil liberties. Some argue that it's essential to maintain order, however you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect items to come out well. In the event that Patriot Act is to be kept as law, the individuals that people elect to your House of Representatives (House) and Senate need certainly to hold the those who make use of it accountable who overstep or abuse the ability provided to them. Also, the president should not be the deciding aspect in deeming a person a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving a person such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.</p> <h2>The annals of this Patriot Act actually goes back towards the century that is eighteenth different laws put into place during war time and energy to protect the united states.</h2>  <p>The protection of your nation may be the highest and the most responsibility that is important of government. The laws created are meant to be into the interest that is best associated with citizens. The power to look after their welfare and to protect them after all, the citizens give the government. People with this  standard of power sometimes pay attention to the whole without rational in addition to individual has to pay the fee. There ought to be a limit regarding the power regarding the government, but if the way that is nation’s of, liberty and quest for property come in jeopardy we have to consider the rational the federal government uses when governing this nation. We can not as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being carried out. So that you can elicit change, we have to stand up and do something about it.</p>